- Delighful Convenience Stores in South Korea
- Before Smartphones and Computers Kids Had Real Fun
- Vintage Pictures Brought to Life After Colourisation
- Question: Would the White House Even Try to Defend Our International Reputation in the Event of a Devastating Attack on Innocent People Living Here or Even on American Citizens? I Think Not!
- Spectacular Mountain Landscape Photography
mmcdonald72014 on Question: Would the White Hous… mmcdonald72014 on Sessions Failure to Recuse Him… mmcdonald72014 on Sessions Failure to Recuse Him… Ghoh on Sessions Failure to Recuse Him… mmcdonald72014 on Sessions Failure to Recuse Him…
- Amazing Videos
- Christmas Music
- Donald Trump
- election 2012
- Election 2016
- Electoral College
- Political Philosophy
- politics 2
- Self help
- Supreme Court
- Supreme Court Nomination
- The Election and Beyond
- Trump Presidency
“The Christology of the book is likewise confused. “Papa” tells Mack that, though Jesus is fully God, “he has never drawn upon his nature as God to do anything. He has only lived out of his relationship with me, living in the very same manner that I desire to be in relationship with every human being.” When Jesus healed the blind, “He did so only as a dependent, limited human being trusting in my life and power to be at work within him and through him. Jesus, as a human being, had no power within himself to heal anyone.””
“The Christology of the book … [may be] confused” – I havn’t any background to judge – but the concept here is, for me, a wonderfully life affirming one. If we accept the premise that Jesus truly engaged only his power as a human being, as simply a person, we learn that those powers he invoked are our own as human beings, and available to us all!
Later in the article, beyond what’s available in your post, the author says:
“The most controversial aspects of The Shack‘s message have revolved around questions of universalism, universal redemption, and ultimate reconciliation. Jesus tells Mack: “Those who love me come from every system that exists. They were Buddhists or Mormons, Baptists or Muslims, Democrats, Republicans and many who don’t vote or are not part of any Sunday morning or religious institutions.” Jesus adds, “I have no desire to make them Christian, but I do want to join them in their transformation into sons and daughters of my Papa, into my brothers and sisters, my Beloved.””
Again, I am not prepared to evaluate “controversial aspects,” but I am in the universal realm. The Jesus who looks to include everyone in salvation, who wouldn’t ever quote scripture to exclude people and call it “controversial” to include all good people, or perhaps potentially all people, is the Jesus I want to believe in, and do believe in!
This remark towards the end of the article is to me terrifying!
“All this reveals a disastrous failure of evangelical discernment. It is hard not to conclude that theological discernment is now a lost art among American evangelicals — and this loss can only lead to theological catastrophe.”
I am confused!
The publishing world sees very few books reach blockbuster status, but William Paul Young’s The Shack has now exceeded even that. The book, originally self-published by Young and two friends, has now sold more than 10 million copies and has been translated into over thirty languages. It is now one of the best-selling paperback books of all time, and its readers are enthusiastic.
According to Young, the book was originally written for his own children. In essence, it can be described as a narrative theodicy — an attempt to answer the question of evil and the character of God by means of a story. In this story, the main character is grieving the brutal kidnapping and murder of his…
View original post 477 more words
An honorable person would have recused themselves immediately, breaking the news themselves, not waiting, hoping to get away with it!
But he has been considering “recusal over the last several weeks.” SEVERAL WEEKS!
“In a statement, Sessions said that over the last several weeks he has been meeting with “relevant senior career department officials” over whether he should recuse himself and “having concluded those meetings today I have decided to recuse myself from any existing or future investigations of any99th matters related in any way to the campaigns for president of the United States.”
After “several weeks,” I wonder, why TODAY?
Because the news broke YESTERDAY, and even then he obviously considered trying to get away with it!
“The move comes after it was reported Wednesday night that Sessions had two meetings with the Russian ambassador to the U.S. in 2016 after he started supporting Donald Trump’s presidential bid and then failed to disclose the contacts during his confirmation hearing.”
The issue here is not the merits. The issue is character! The slightest genuine question, or ambiguity, should be enough for an honorable person to realize that in an inquiry that will surely raise questions about themself, they don’t belong!
If he had removed himself immediately, when only he himself was aware of the issue, it would have elevated his stature and perhaps opened some minds which have been dead set against him.
But, unfortunately, our expectations of him have been confirmed!