In my post Conversation with Defender of Trump Tweets and Subsequent Threats to Carrier Union Leader, Trump’s challenge to the President’s legitimacy was, for me, in Aristotle’s terms, “Necessary and Sufficient.”

To say that Trump’s “birther” claim was a Necessary & Sufficient Cause for my conclusion that he was unfit to hold any public office, especially President, was an insult to the concept of Sufficient Causes. I can only hope that this serves as a Sufficient apology.

A Sufficient Cause explains without recourse to any other factors or Causes. There is no limit to the number of Sufficient Causes. [In Trump’s case, the “birther” thing was only the first of many, many, many, “Oh My God”, so many many… Sufficient Causes.] A Necessary Cause is required before any other factors function. Therefore, Sufficient Causes are in a separate exalted league from Necessary Causes, “A Difference in Kind.” To call a Sufficient Cause “Necessary and Sufficient” is an insult to a Sufficient Cause, and I apologize.


About Ghoh

My name is Joe, but username Joe was already taken. I am interested in politics, religion and ideas that are off the beaten path, whatever the subject.
Link | This entry was posted in Donald Trump, Philosophy, Politics, politics 2 and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s